Nevertheless, I still insist on my opinion. Actually, people should listen to music they enjoy. In this case the hormone of happiness is produced and listeners start feeling positive emotions, which improve their mental condition.
In conclusion, I would like to stress once more that under no circumstances should individuals avoid listening to music, because it is extremely beneficial and useful for their health. If the humanity did not listen to music, people would be exhausted and furious.
Risk-takers are more successful in life
Undoubtedly, everybody wants to become successful, because in the majority of cases success is thought to be a synonym to happiness. But, in fact, becoming successful is extremely complicated.
I totally agree with the statement above. I do believe that a person’s success depends on how risky s/he is. Firstly, risk-takers tend to notice all chances, which may help them to succeed. Secondly, such people tend to be not afraid of losing everything, because they are groovy. So, every opportunity is used. Finally, they make decisions faster than more rational people, subsequently, their activity is more productive and efficient.
Nevertheless, there is another point of view on this issue. Some people claim that it is impossible for risk-takers to succeed in life. They seem to act and later think. Moreover, their irrational behaviour usually ends in losing everything.
However, I still insist on my opinion. All risk-takers always weigh up pros and cons of their action, which prevents them from making mistakes.
In conclusion, I would like to stress once more that under no circumstances should people avoid being risky, because only in this case it is probable to succeed. If there were not any risk-takers, there would not be any millionaires.
.
.
.
.
.
In future robots will replace pets as people’s companions
Undoubtedly, a host of inventions have been made recently, which have changed the existence of the humanity profoundly. Specialists tend to anticipate that in near future machines will totally penetrate our life.
I totally disagree with the statement above. I do believe that pets will never be replaced by atomised machines. Firstly, animals are a part of our ecosystem. If they vanish, nature will destabilise, which will influence our environment badly. Secondly, robots do not look so cute as pets do, subsequently, children will be afraid of machines. Finally, animals seem to feel people’s emotions and act in such a way to encourage a host or, on the contrary, to sympathize. Evidently, robots are not capable of it.
Nevertheless, there is another point of view on this issue. Some people claim that in the epoch of technologies they would rather have a robot than a real pet. Actually, hosts will not have to pay for special food, vaccines, clothes and stuff like that. Moreover, if a person becomes exhausted with robot s/he will just turn them off, which cannot be done with real animals.
However, I still insist on my opinion. Actually, a pet is supposed to be a friend of a human being, so it is not an object to save on.
In conclusion, I would like to stress once more that under no circumstances will people own robots instead of pets, because it is impossible to betray a friend. If people were not keen on keeping animals, now they all would use Tamagotchi.
