Evolutionarily, submission served as a means of survival. Recognizing one’s role in a group reduced stress and strengthened social bonds. Today, this mechanism continues to operate at the psychological level: conscious submission in trusting relationships reduces anxiety, activates oxytocin, and strengthens a sense of safety. It is not an act of weakness but a way to create a balance between personal responsibility and trust in others.
Submission is the art of interacting with the world. It requires maturity to understand your boundaries and courage to accept them. It is an act that does not diminish your strength but transforms it. When you stop fighting the inevitable, you free up resources for what truly matters. True strength is manifested not in endless struggle but in the ability to be flexible, mindful, and open to the world.
Submission is not weakness. It is a way to go beyond illusions, accept reality, and find freedom in harmony with yourself. It is a choice made by the strong, who understand that strength lies not in control but in the ability to embrace life as it is while remaining true to oneself.
Part 3: The Evolution of Power and Trust
Chapter 1: Why Our Ancestors Already Knew How It Works
The Evolutionary Roots of Submission and Domination
Why do we continue to submit to leaders and strive for power? Because these mechanisms are the foundation of our survival. They were formed millions of years ago when the struggle for life required a clear division of roles. Submission and domination are not just social constructs but evolutionary tools that helped our species survive and thrive.
In primitive tribes, hierarchy was not just convenient but vital. Leaders assumed responsibility for the group’s protection, decision-making, and resource distribution. Subordinates trusted their authority, reducing internal conflicts and ensuring coordinated actions. This interaction was based on biological mechanisms that remain active today.
On a neurological level, submission and domination are governed by different systems. Dominant individuals exhibit high levels of testosterone, which enhances risk-taking and confidence, making them ideal leaders in extreme situations. Subordinates, on the other hand, experience increased levels of oxytocin, which fosters trust and a sense of belonging. According to a study in Nature Neuroscience (2015), in situations requiring hierarchy, dominant individuals activate brain regions linked to decision-making, while subordinates activate areas that reduce anxiety through trust.
This balance allowed groups to function as cohesive units. Leadership provided stability and coordination, while submission helped prevent chaos and unnecessary conflict. As a result, groups with clearly defined roles survived and passed these behavioral patterns to their descendants.
With the transition to agricultural societies, hierarchies became more complex. Power shifted from individual leaders to institutions—rulers, religious figures, and military leaders. However, the biological foundation remained unchanged. We still seek strong, confident leaders who provide a sense of security and are willing to trust them to avoid uncertainty.
Today, these mechanisms manifest not only in politics or workplaces but also in relationships, teams, and even social media. We continue to follow those who inspire confidence and submit to those we trust. This is neither weakness nor coincidence—it is a part of our nature that has been shaped over millennia.
