Now consciousness in representation of science is considered secondary, a consequence of natural processes. As you can see, everything occurs on the contrary: the unidirectional change of beingness as conjoint complex of the material objects, space and time happens in case of constant involvement of consciousness. Absence of consciousness in beingness means the actual absence of beingness so as even if to assume existence of such beingness, who will be able grasp this beingness, so no matter is it or not, this will still remain unknown to anyone, because that someone doesn't exist. And, on the contrary: without support on beingness consciousness is lost as there are not apps for it, or there is nothing to do to it. Such consciousness, which is nothing to do, can't be. About what development of consciousness it is possible to speak here?
The material beingness in the infinite variety is always together with the material echelon – by consciousness, without which this variety couldn't be manifested. The term "always" means that outside duration the consciousness isn't present, hence, there is no beingness also. Therefore a condition of their coexistence is time. In its finite duration the consciousness only and is capable to interact with remaining beingness, to open it as consciousness can until, and reveal itself into it in the changes.
Thus, not "the thing in itself (the transcendental object)” is outside any thinking" as Kant [3] claimed, but both material objects – a thing and consciousness – only and coexist really in the interaction so as not consciousness in itself only influences on itself and surrounding it, but and the thing always influences on consciousness. This mutual influence means that the friend without friend they are lost. Therefore Fichte's thought: "I do myself: own beingness by means of the thinking … I – it is unconditional, is own creation" [4], is correct only half. Without support of consciousness on remaining beingness consciousness can create nothing, including itself. Though, certainly, it is difficult to deny the leading role of consciousness in the process of interaction.
For the person who has consciousness, itself consciousness remains as "the thing in itself (the transcendental object)” at any level of development of the person. It is implicit the person himself recognized this fact long ago, having declared that consciousness is incorporeal, ideal. Really, consciousness can't be touched, but after all and a magnetic field we can't feel.
Actually there is nothing more real than consciousness thanks to which, actually, all and occurs, more precisely, everything is manifested.
Consciousness as the highest material component of beingness responds for maintenance of an animateness of beingness and manifests it variously, taking care of itself and it. However similar high-organized form of a matter has no basis in our three dimensional measurement, and only goes it through the appropriate carriers, restricting itself in this finite who, naturally, can only rejoice and be surprised to this arrival but who will not be able to penetrate into structure of matter of the "highest" measurement. Therefore we can only build guesses about consciousness and our own mission, as temporal owners of consciousness. You can read about it in the final chapter and in the source [1].
